Escalera v. Public Defenders Office et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 3, 2009
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 8 Letter Request for Postponement of Proceedings. Because Pla has not filed an amended complaint, his case remains dismissed w/o prejudice pursuant to the reasons set forth in Court's 1/12/2009 Order 12 . If Pla wishes to prosecute this action, he may file a new complaint in this Court under a new case number. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 6/3/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (jrl).
|January 12, 2009
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Plaintiff Jesus Escalera's 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is granted. Warden of the FCI shall collect from Pla's prison trust acct the balance of $350 of the filing fee by collecting monthly pa yments from the acct in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month's income and forward to the Clerk each time the acct exceeds $10. Pla's Complaint is dismissed w/o prejudice. Pla is granted 45 days leave from the date this Or der is filed to file a First Amended Complaint. If Pla's Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, it may be dismissed w/o further leave to amend and may be counted as a "strike" under 28 USC 1915(g). C opy of the Order mailed to Warden, FCI Memphis. Blank copy of 1983 Complaint form w/ filing instructions t/w copy of this Order mailed to Plaintiff. Case closed. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 1/12/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?