Martin v. Yates
Petitioner: Robbie Martin
Respondent: James A Yates
Case Number: 3:2008cv02203
Filed: November 26, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Roger T. Benitez
Presiding Judge: Leo S. Papas
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Denial of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus: Objections to R&R due by 9/18/2009, Replies due by 10/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 8/27/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mkz) (av1).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Yates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robbie Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James A Yates
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?