Bryant v. Armstrong et al
| Stanford Paul Bryant |
| T Armstrong, Tim Ochoa, Gerald J Janda, T Catlett, Larry Scribner, James Tilton and John DOES |
| 3:2008cv02318 |
| March 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Imperial |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Thomas J. Whelan |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
ORDER (1) Adopting (Doc. 117 ) Report and Recommendation, (2) Granting In Part and Denying In Part (Doc. 91 ) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and (3) Denying (Doc. 92 ) Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 3/11/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER Regarding Discovery Motions: It is hereby ordered the Court is Granting 53 Motion to Compel; Granting in Part and Denying in Part 56 Motion to Compel; Granting 66 Motion to Compel; Granting 71 Motion to Compel; Granting in Part and Denying in Part 74 Motion to Compel; Granting 82 Motion to Compel; and Denying as Moot 86 Motion to Compel. The Defendants' discovery responses must be served by June 29, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 6/14/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
