Chakiris v. Hartley et al
| 3:2009cv00016 |
| January 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Dana M. Sabraw |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER (1) denying Request for Certificate of Appealability and (2) denying 44 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal. The Court finds Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find this Court's dismissal of his petition debatable. Therefore, the Court denies Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability. The Court also denies Petitioner's motion to proceed IFP on appeal for failure to satisfy the requirements of FRAP 24(a)(1)(A). Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 11/18/2009. (Order electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chakiris v. Hartley et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
