Lau v. Giurbina et al
| Hon C Lau |
| George Giurbina and L E Scribner |
| 3:2009cv00033 |
| January 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Kings |
| M. James Lorenz |
| Leo S. Papas |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
Order by Judge M. James Lorenz. DENYING Without Prejudice 5 & 7 MOTIONS to Appoint Counsel; GRANTING 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice for Failing to State a Claim: Director of CA Department of Corrections to collect initial partial filing fee of $0 and forward to Clerk of Court, and directing payment of $350.00 balance of the filing fee collected in payments from plaintiff's prison trust account in an amount e qual to 20 percent of preceding month's income credited to prisoner's trust account and forward payments to Clerk of Court each time account exceeds $10 pursuant to 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Clerk of Court to serve copy of this order on Dire ctor of CA Department of Corrections. Plaintiff is GRANTED 45 days leave to file a First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/3/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Order mailed to Ca. Dept of Corrections).(mjj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
