Sandoval v. Barnhart

Plaintiff: Grace L. Sandoval
Defendant: Benjamin Barnhart
Case Number: 3:2009cv00269
Filed: March 18, 2009
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: Assault Libel & Slander Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: William Q. Hayes
Referring Judge: Louisa S. Porter
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 18, 2009 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: The Motion for Leave to Proceed In Formal Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is granted. The Court dismisses the case without prejudice, and denies the Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 3 ) as moot. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/18/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc) (jrl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sandoval v. Barnhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Grace L. Sandoval
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benjamin Barnhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?