Michell et al v. United States of America et al
| Frank W. Michell, Mary Christine Michell and Christopher Damitz |
| United States of America and DOES |
| 3:2009cv00387 |
| February 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Motor Vehicle Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2271 Federal Tort Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER Granting 78 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement. The settlement reached between the United States and the the Settling Defendants is found to be in good faith within the meaning of Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 877.6, and any othe r joint tortfeasor is barred from any further claims against Settling Defendants for equitable comparative contribution or comparative indemnity based on comparative negligence or comparative fault. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/6/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER Denying 71 Motion to Amend Complaint. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/23/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER Denying 62 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement and 63 Motion for Leave to File Interpleader. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/31/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
