Escamilla v. Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. et al

Plaintiff: Virgilio Escamilla
Defendant: Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. and Does 1 through 10
Case Number: 3:2009cv00391
Filed: February 26, 2009
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: Banks and Banking Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Janis L. Sammartino
Referring Judge: Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 12:1819 Default of Promissory Note

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Escamilla v. Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Virgilio Escamilla
Represented By: Matthew Michael McCormick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.
Represented By: Frederick K Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?