Grooms et al v. Legge et al
| James Grooms, Brycemarie Phelan and Knukle, Inc. |
| John Legge, Gwen Legge, Knukle, Inc., Artillery Distribution, Sean Myers, Devin Mercado and DOES |
| 3:2009cv00489 |
| March 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Trademark Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Louisa S. Porter |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER denying Defendants' 60 Motion to Dismiss and 60 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying Defendants' 61 Motion to Dismiss and 61 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 7/8/2009. (jah)(jrl).
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER denying in their entirety Defendants' 44 and 45 Motion to Dismiss, to Transfer for Improper Venue, or to Transfer for Convenience. Court finds Defendants have failed to make a strong showing of inconvenience to warrant upsetting Plaintiffs' choice of forum. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 5/22/2009. (jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting in part Plaintiffs' 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Denying Plaintiffs' Motions for Contempt, Sanctions and Attys' Fees. Denying Defendants' Motions to Strike. Preliminary injunction is effective on the filin g of this Order. Plaintiffs' undertaking of $10,000, posted to secure the TRO, will be applied to this preliminary injunction. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 4/8/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting Defendants' 30 Motion to Clarify the Extent of the TRO. Court finds that dfts have complied w/ the Order by closing the website. At this juncture, turing over control of the website would affect future purchase orders, which exc eeds the bounds of the quoted conditiional language. Court orders parties to hold status quo on the transfer of ownership of the website until 4/7/2009 hearing on plaintiffs' pending motions. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 4/1/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Following Discovery Conference. Discovery Conference was held on 3/27/2009. Court directs dft to file an ex parte application for clarification of Judge Gonzalez's Order on the transfer of the website. Court orders the parties to hold the status quo on the transfer of ownership pending clarification by Juidge Gonzalez. The matter of expedited discovery is now complete and the pretrial management is returned back to Magistrate Judge Porter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 3/30/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
14
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. The TRO is effective when Plaintiffs file an undertaking in the amount of $10,000. This Order and supporting papers must served upon Dfts by 3/18/2009. Plaintiffs' 4 Motion for Expedited Discovery is granted, the extent of which is to be determined by the Magistrate Judge. Dfts' Opposition to Plaintiffs' MOTION for Preliminary Injunction due by 3/27/2009. Plaintiffs' Replies due by 3/31/2009. Motion Hearing set for 4/7/2009 10:30 AM in Courtroom 01 before Judge Irma E. Gonzalez. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 3/17/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
