Pittman v. Kenndy et al
Case Number: 3:2009cv00546
Filed: March 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
Presiding Judge: Anthony J. Battaglia
Presiding Judge: Irma E. Gonzalez
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Court sua sponte dismisses case w/o prejudice for failing to pay the $350 filing fee or file a Motion for IFP pursuant to 28 USC 1914(a) and 1915(a). Pla granted 45 days leave form the date of this Order is filed to a.) pr epay the entire $450 filing fee, or. b). complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP w/ a certified copy of his trust acct statement for thr 6 month period preceding the filing of the Complaint. If Pla fails to either prepay the $350 filing f ee or submit a Motion to Proceed IFP within that time, action shall be dismissed w/o prejudice and w/o further Order of Court. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 3/25/2009. Case is closed. Blank Motion for IFP form t/w copy of this Order mailed to Plaintiff. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (av1).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pittman v. Kenndy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?