Blaj et al v. Stewart Enterprises et al
Elizabeth Blaj and Sandra Romero |
Stewart Enterprises, El Camino Memorial Park & Mortuary, Elliot Stein and DOES |
3:2009cv00734 |
April 10, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
San Diego |
Ruben B. Brooks |
Larry Alan Burns |
Both |
Federal Question |
29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER Dismissing Demand for a Jury Trial and Claims for Monetary Relief; Blaj is not entitled to a jury trial on her ERISA claim, and her demand for one is stricken; the Court sees no reason to deviate from the holding of Millsap on the facts of this case, and accordingly dismissed Blaj's claims for past wages; Blaj must amend her complaint to add a reinstatement demand within 7 calendar days of the date this Order is entered; Blaj's request for monetary relief is dismissed in part; Stewart's request for attorney's fees is, at this time, denied without prejudice; Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/11/11. (kaj) |
Filing 50 ORDER granting 20 Motion for Summary Judgment: After a thorough review of the evidence and consideration of the parties' respective arguments, the Court cannot but reach the conclusion that, at best, Blaj can show that Stewart terminated her in retaliation for exercising certain rights under an ERISA plan. Stewart's summary judgment motion is granted as to all claims but this one. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 11/23/10. (lmt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.