Merchant v. Lopez et al
| Curtis Harvey Merchant |
| H Lopez, P Weitzeil and R Madden |
| 3:2009cv00856 |
| April 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER denying 58 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 60 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 4/13/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Re Plaintiff's Discovery Motions (Re Docs. 42 , 44 , 46 ): All of the motions are denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 9/8/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER: The (Doc. 22 ) Motion for Review of Honorable Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Request for Leave to Take Written Deposition of Prison Employees Under Abuse of Discretion is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 5/12/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motions For Leave To Take Written Depositions Of Prison Employees (Re Docs. 18 , 19 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 3/8/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
