FNS, Inc. v. Bowerman Trucking, Inc. et al
| FNS, Inc. |
| Bowerman Trucking, Inc., Vision X-Press, Inc., N.E.W.S. Logistics, LLC, Victoria Lee Baine and DOES |
| Bowerman Trucking, Inc. |
| Vision X-Press, Inc., N.E.W.S. Logistics, LLC and Victoria Lee Baine |
| 3:2009cv00866 |
| April 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Defendant |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Dft Bowerman Trucking's 29 Motion to Dismiss Pla's First Amended Complaint and granting 30 Motion to Strike Portions of Pla's First Amended Complaint. Dft's motion to dismiss is grant ed w/ respect to Pla's 1st, 3rd, 4th, 6th and 7th causes of action for negligence, indemnity, contribution, and breaches of contract. Dft's motion to dismiss is denied w/ respect to Pla's 2nd and 5th causes of action for indemnity under the Carmack Amendment and for declaratory relief. Dft's motion to strike Pla's prayer for atty's fees is granted. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 2/9/2010. (jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Granting 22 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 11/9/09. (cap) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
