Barba de la Torre et al v. Icenhower et al
Plaintiff: |
Martha Margarita Barba de la Torre and Alejandro Diaz |
Defendant: |
Jerry L Icenhower, Donna Lee Icenhower, Hobart Icenhower, Jerry Lee Icenhower, Howell & Gardner Investors, Inc., Icenhower Investments, Western Financial Assets, Inc., Buckeye International Funding, Inc. and DOES |
Case Number: |
3:2009cv01161 |
Filed: |
May 29, 2009 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Office: |
San Diego Office |
County: |
XX Outside US |
Presiding Judge: |
Barry Ted Moskowitz |
Presiding Judge: |
Louisa S. Porter |
Nature of Suit: |
Plaintiff |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
March 6, 2012 |
Filing
116
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Martha Margarita Barba de la Torre and Plaintiff Alejandro Diaz shall have judgment against Defendant Mary Suzanne Icenhower and Brian S. Icenhower, Trustees of the Hobert Gerald Icenhower and Mary Suzanne Icenhower Revocable Trust Dated September 19, 2007; and Brian S. Icenhower, Executor of the Estate of Hobert Gerald Icenhower in the total amount of $1,265,230. It is further Ordered that said Counter claimants tak e nothing by virtue of their counterclaim on file herein. Plaintiffs claims against the defendants other than Mary Suzanne Icenhower and Brian S. Icenhower, Trustees of the Hobert Gerald Icenhower and Mary Suzanne Icenhower Revocable Trust Dated September 19, 2007, and Brian S. Icenhower, Executor of the Estate of Hobert Gerald Icenhower, shall be dismissed. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
August 18, 2011 |
Filing
95
ORDER Denying 89 Motion to Extend Litigation Dates and Denying 94 Motion Requesting a Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 8/18/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
February 9, 2011 |
Filing
78
ORDER Granting Leave to File Amended Answer. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/9/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer)
|
July 22, 2010 |
Filing
66
ORDER Denying 55 Motion to Dismiss and 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. The case will move forward, and the parties are precluded from filing a motion to reconsider this order. Only Jerry and Dona Icenhower have answered the TAC, and all other Defendants must file their answers within twenty-one days of the filing of this order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/22/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(vet)
|
February 17, 2010 |
Filing
39
ORDER granting in part Plaintiffs' ex parte application to continue the telephonic Early Neutral Evaluation Conference 38 and VACATES the ENE scheduled for February 24, 2010. The Court will conduct a telephonic, attorneys-only Case Management Conference on May 24, 2010 at 9:15 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 2/17/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl) (jrl).
|
October 28, 2009 |
Filing
19
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendants' 7 Motion to Dismiss. The Court grants Plaintiffs leave to file a second amended complaint. Any amended complaint must be filed within 15 days of the filing of this order. Defendant shall file an answer within 35 days of filing of this order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/28/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(vet)(jrl).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?