Ybarra v. Martel et al
Edward Ybarra |
M Martel and Jerry Brown |
3:2009cv01188 |
June 1, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
Amador |
Anthony J. Battaglia |
Larry Alan Burns |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER denying 47 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal. For these reasons, and for reasons set forth in the Court's earlier orders, the Court CERTIFIES that the appeal would not be taken in good faith. Ybarra's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is therefore DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 12/12/2011. (USCA Case Number 11-55658. Order electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.)(akr) |
Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 34 ; the R&R is modified to include the new citations to Swarthout and Harrington; court has reviewed de novo all portions of the R&R to which Ybarra objected, and overrules his objections; the Court has also reviewed the R&R more generally, and concludes its findings and recommendations are correct; Ybarra's objections are overruled and the Court adopts the R&R, as modified; all pending motions are denied as moot; the Petition is denied; the Certificate of Appealability is denied; Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/10/11.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.