Oliva v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group et al
Plaintiff: Maria A. Oliva
Defendant: Southern California Permanente Medical Group and Does 1-20
Case Number: 3:2009cv01230
Filed: June 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: M James Lorenz
Referring Judge: Nita L Stormes
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Granting #6 Joint Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice: The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 7/23/2009. (mjj) (av1).
July 23, 2009 Filing 6 NOTICE by Southern California Permanente Medical Group of Joint Stipulation For Dismissal (Gardner, Adam) (mjj)
July 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice and ORDER Vacating Early Neutral Evaluation and Setting Telephonic Settlement Disposition Conference: In light of the Notice of Settlement filed, It is Hereby Ordered that the Early Neutral Evaluation set for July 13, 2009 is VACATED. A telephonic Settlement Disposition Conference is set for 8/14/2009 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 7/6/2009. (mjj) (jrl).
July 1, 2009 Filing 4 NOTICE of Settlement by Maria A. Oliva (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Geyman, Douglas) Modified on 7/2/2009 - sent email instructing to refile. Should be motion. Has proposed order attached. Incomplete signature (mjj)
June 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice and Order Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. An Early Neutral Evaluation will be held on 7/13/2009 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 6/10/09. (vet) (jrl).
June 5, 2009 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Southern California Permanente Medical Group - no parent corporation. (mjj)
June 5, 2009 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL t/w Complaint and Answer from Superior Court, County of San Diego, CA., case number 37-2008-00100077-CU-OE-EC. ( Filing fee $ 350 Receipt number 1729), filed by Southern California Permanente Medical Group.(joeh)(kaj).
June 5, 2009 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint in notice of removal by Southern California Permanente Medical Group.(joeh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oliva v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southern California Permanente Medical Group
Represented By: Adam R. Gardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria A. Oliva
Represented By: Douglas E. Geyman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?