Johnson v. Homecomings Financial et al
| Wes W. Johnson |
| Homecomings Financial, GMAC Mortgage, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Executive Trustee Services, Pite Duncan and DOES |
| 3:2009cv01262 |
| June 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| M. James Lorenz |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Plaintiff |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 87 Motion to Vacate. Plaintiffs refiled motion for reconsideration 59 , deemed timely filed on May 18, 2012, isReopened. Plaintiff may file on or before December 18, 2015, an amended motion for reconside ration to update legal arguments and citations. The amended motion for reconsideration will relate back to the initial May 18, 2012 filing date, and will be deemed timely filed for purposes of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59 and 60. Defendants sh all file a response to the amended motion for reconsideration on or before January 4, 2016; Plaintiff may file a reply memorandum on or before January 11, 2016. The amended motion will be considered without oral argument after January 19, 2016. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 12/11/2015. (sjt)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER granting 46 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint With Prejudice. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/19/2012. (mtb)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting 29 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. The followingclaims are dismissed with prejudice: NRS 598D.100; wrongful foreclosure; quiet title; violation of FCRA, FDCPA and TILA; unjust enrichment. The following claims are dismissed without prejudice: all fraud claims; breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing; and breach of contract. Because injunctive and declaratory judgment are remedies, they are dismissed as causes of action. If plaintiff intends to file a second amended complaint, he must do so in conformity with this Order no later than October 3, 2011. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 9/19/2011. (mtb)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Granting 11 Motion to Dismiss With Leave to Amend: If plaintiff intends to amend the complaint, he must do so within 20 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 8/5/2010. (mjj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
