Strong v. Valdez Fine Foods et al
Matt Strong |
Valdez Fine Foods, Peter Piper, Inc. and Vestar California XVII, LLC |
3:2009cv01278 |
June 12, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Jan M. Adler |
Michael M. Anello |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Americans with Disabilities Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER: Denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; and Denying as Moot 56 Motion For Leave to File First Amended Complaint. For the reasons stated herein, the Court Grants Defendants' motion for summar y judgment, Denies Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment; and Denies Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a first amended complaint as moot. The Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate the case file and enter judgment in favor of Defend ants Valdez Fine Foods (doing business as Peter Piper Pizza #223) and Vestar California XVII, LLC, and against Plaintiff Matt Strong. Defendants' request for attorneys' fees is denied, however, as the prevailing party, Defendants are entitled to seek their costs as provided in the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 2/4/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Filing 18 ORDER continuing telephonic Case Management Conference to 12/3/09 at 9:00 a.m. 17 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 11/16/09. (tkl) (jrl). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.