Munoz v. Fredrick et al
| Juan Munoz |
| M Fredrick, Robert J Hernandez, E Contreras, R Contreras, A Legdaan and J Rodriguas |
| 3:2009cv01303 |
| July 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Kern |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| William McCurine |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER granting Defendants' 73 Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 56. Clerk shall enter judgment for the Defendants and close the file. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 7/13/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER denying 98 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice at this time. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 4/1/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 16 Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b) and 12(B)(6). Dfts R. Contreras and J. Rodriguas are dismissed from action for failing to prosecute pursuant to FRCP 4(m). Dfts Freder ick and Lagdaan shall file Answer to the 8th Amendment excessive force claims remaining in Pla's Complaint w/in 14 days of the date this Order is "Filed" pursuant to FRCP 12(a)(4)(A). Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 3/25/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jah) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
