Copeland v. Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 3, 2011
ORDER: The (Doc. 42 ) Motion to Dismiss is granted. The (Doc. 43 ) Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File an Opposition to Motion to Dismiss in Excess of 25 Pages is granted. The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB and Aurora Loan Services, Inc. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/3/2011. (mdc)
|July 15, 2010
ORDER Granting (Doc. 27 ) Motion to Dismiss. The First Amended Complaint is Dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB and Aurora Loan Services, Inc. No later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend the First Amended Complaint, accompanied by a proposed second amended complaint. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/15/2010. (srm)
|April 7, 2010
ORDER: The (Doc. 14 ) Motion to Amend Complaint is granted, and the (Doc. 22 ) Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Motion to Amend Complaint in Excess of 10 Pages is granted. No later than 14 days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff may file the proposed first amended complaint which is attached to the Motion to Amend Complaint. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 4/7/2010. (mdc)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?