Escalante v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company et al
| Alicia Escalante |
| Minnesota Life Insurance Company, Irwin Mortgage Corporation, Irwin Financial Corporation and DOES |
| 3:2009cv01843 |
| August 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| M. James Lorenz |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER Denying (Doc. 33 ) Motion to Dismiss. Defendant Irwin Mortgage Corporation's motion to dismiss is Denied. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 12/2/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (srm)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Minnesota Life Insurance Company; and Granting With Leave to Amend 15 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Irwin Mortgage Corporation and Irwin Financial Corporat ion: If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, she must do so no later than August 9, 2010. Defendants shall respond to the amended complaint within the time set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3). If Plaintiff chooses not to file an amended complaint, Defendants shall respond within the same period of time calculated from August 9, 2010. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 7/22/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mjj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
