Priority Pharmacy, Inc. v. Serono, Inc. et al
Priority Pharmacy, Inc. |
Serono, Inc., Serono Laboratories, Inc. and DOES |
3:2009cv01867 |
August 27, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Barry Ted Moskowitz |
Louisa S Porter |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER granting 21 Motion to Dismiss. The first amended complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. The Court will grant Priority one final chance to amend its complaint. If Priority chooses to do so, Priority must file the Second Amended Complaint within 20 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/20/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(vet) (jrl). |
Filing 16 ORDER Denying 9 Motion to Transfer Venue and Granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 20 days of the entry of this order. Failure to do so will result in the closing of this case. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 1/5/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(vet) (jrl). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.