Pittman et al v. County of San Diego et al
| Joseph Pittman and Diana Pittman |
| County of San Diego, El Cajon, City of and Does |
| 3:2009cv01952 |
| September 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion For Reconsideration (Doc. 26 ) Or Order To Produce Portions Of Internal Files (Doc. 23 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 11/3/2010. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER For Defendant To Produce Portions Of Internal Files: The Court finds documents Bates numbered Sheriff 001832 - Sheriff 001957 to be relevant, not privileged, and orders the report and attached documents to be produced to Plaintiffs. All persona l identifying information other than names shall be redacted. Plaintiffs' request for personnel records and citizen complaints is denied regarding documents Bates numbered Sheriff 000001 - Sheriff 001832 as these documents are not relevant to an y of Plaintiffs' requests or any claims in the instant lawsuit. The Court will destroy the copies submitted for in camera review. Counsel for Defendants must produce the redacted documents to Plaintiffs no later than 10/1/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 9/17/2010. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
