Rojero v. Noll

Petitioner: Julio Mata Rojero
Respondent: Coleen Noll
Case Number: 3:2009cv02047
Filed: September 16, 2009
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: M. James Lorenz
Referring Judge: Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 12, 2010 28 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Dismissing First Amended Petition: Petitioners objections are overruled, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as modified herein, and the amended petition is DISMISSED. Certificate of Appealability denied. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 8/12/2010.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mjj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rojero v. Noll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Julio Mata Rojero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Coleen Noll
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?