Sommer v. United States of America et al
Cynthia Sommer |
United States of America, Rob Terwilliger, Rick Rendon, Mark Ridley, S.D. Adams, Jose Centeno, County of San Diego Medical Examiner's Office, Glenn N Wagner, County of San Diego District Attorney's Office, Bonnie Dumanis, Laura Gunn and Does 1 thorugh 100, inclusive |
3:2009cv02093 |
September 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Ruben B. Brooks |
William Q. Hayes |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 141 ORDER: The Objection to Order Denying Without Prejudice Ex Parte Application to Amend Scheduling Order (Doc. 120 ) filed by Plaintiff is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 2/3/2012. (mdc) |
Filing 124 ORDER: The Objection to Order Denying Defendant Dumanis' Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Doc. 106 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant may file an additional motion to compel no later than twenty-five days from the date of this Order. All discovery matters are referred to Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1(b). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/5/2012. (mdc) |
Filing 118 ORDER denying without prejudice 107 Ex Parte Application to Amend Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 12/21/11. (lao) |
Filing 104 ORDER: (1) Requiring Production Of Plaintiff's Un-Redacted Fee Statements For In Camera Review; (2) Denying Defendant Dumanis's Motion To Compel Production Documents (Re Doc. 82 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 10/3/2011. (mdc) |
Filing 103 ORDER (1) Granting In Part And Denying In Part Plaintiff's Motion To Compel Production Of Certain Documents; (2) Denying Plaintiff's Request For Sanctions (Re Doc. 83 ): Defendants are ordered to produce for the Court's in camera review the documents identified within 5 days of the filed date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 9/22/2011. (mdc) |
Filing 101 ORDER Granting In Part Joint Motion For Extension of Time (Re Doc. 99 ): The Court grants the motion as follows: (1) written expert reports must be served no later than 9/30/2011; (2) reports intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on the sa me subject matter identified by another party under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) must be served no later than 10/14/2011; (3) the parties will need to coordinate and schedule all expert witness depositions so that they are completed no later than 11/18/2011; (4) the deadline to file pretrial motions, other than motions in limine and motions to amend is 12/16/2011. No other dates or deadlines are affected by this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 9/8/2011. (mdc) |
Filing 58 ORDER: "Unnamed Putative Defendant" County of San Diego's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 32 ) is denied as moot because the County is not a defendant to this action. Rob Terwilliger's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 35 ) is granted. Jose Centa no's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 37 ) is granted as to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim and otherwise denied. Rick Rendon and Mark Ridley's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 38 ) is granted. S.D. Adams's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 41 ) is granted. Glenn N. Wagner's Motion to Dismiss as to claims brought against him in his federal capacity (Doc. 54 ) is granted. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 9/10/2010. (mdc) |
Filing 36 ORDER re Motions to Dismiss. It is hereby Ordered that: The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Bonnie Dumanis and Laura Gunn 4 is Denied as to Plaintiff's § 1983 claim and Granted as to Plaintiff's claim for an injunction against future prosecution. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Glenn N. Wagner 5 is Granted as to Plaintiff's § 1983 claim for Monell supervisory liability, Plaintiff's §§ 1985 and 1986 claims, and Plaintiff's claims fo r injunctive relief and is otherwise Denied. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant the United States of America 15 is Granted as to the second claim for relief for violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 5/10/10. (lao) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.