Silva v. Barreras et al
| Jesus Silva |
| Nasaria P Barreras, Khatri, Collinsworth, John Doe and Hatch |
| 3:2009cv02193 |
| October 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Solano |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Thomas J. Whelan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER Finding Plaintiff's Appeal Is Not Taken in Good Faith. For these reasons, the Court finds the appeal is not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 5/18/2012. (USCA Case Number 12-55769. Order electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER adopting 34 Report and Recommendation, granting 32 Motion to Dismiss, and Denying Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 4/2/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mtb)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying without prejudice 10 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel, Extending Time for Service, and Directing Clerk to Send Plaintiff Certified Copy of the In Forma Pauperis/Service Order 8 . Plaintiff shall have an additional 120 days from the date of this order to serve Defendants with the summons and complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 3/14/11. Certified copy of 8 sent to Plaintiff. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(amh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
