Hassaine et al v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc et al
| Lilyan Hassaine and Salim Salahi |
| Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc and Does |
| 3:2009cv02215 |
| October 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Both |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER (Redacted Version) Overruling 50 Objection to Magistrate Judge's 3/30/2011 Order, filed by Lilyan Hassaine. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/19/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER: (1) Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Allow Additional Discovery; and (2) Denying Plaintiffs' Request to Remove Confidentiality Designation re 43 Supplemental Briefing filed by Lilyan Hassaine, 42 Supplemental Briefing filed by Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs' request to reopen discovery in order to conduct additional discovery relating to Defendants document production is denied. Plaintiffs' request to prevent Defendant from designat ing testimony as confidential pursuant to the terms of the operative protective order is also denied. Finally, Plaintiffs request to submit exhibits in support of their requests to reopen discovery is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 3/30/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
