Mendoza et al v. Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc et al
| Flor E. Mendoza and Rene Mendoza |
| Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc, Iovate Health Sciences International , Inc., Iovate Health Sciences Group, Inc., Iovate Health Research, Inc., Iovate HC 2005 Formulations, LTD., Muscletech Research and Development, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
| 3:2009cv02370 |
| October 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Both |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER Denying Defendants' 40 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Fraud Claim (Count VIII) and Illinois Consumer Fraud Claim (Count IX) and Granting Leave to Amend As to Any Claim of Fraud by Omission. The Court grants Plaintiffs 21 days leave to amend any claim for common law fraud by omission. The time to amend shall run from the date of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 6/1/10. (vet)(jrl).
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting (62) Extension of Time for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc to respond to complaint. Answer due on or before 2/1/2010. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/3/2010. Associated Cases: 3:09-md-02087-BTM -AJB, 3:09-cv-02370-BTM-AJB(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) CC: MDL Panel(tkl) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
