Peruta v. County of San Diego et al
| Edward Peruta |
| County of San Diego and William D Gore |
| 3:2009cv02371 |
| October 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER (1) denying 34 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and (2) granting 38 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment: the Court concludes that Defendant's policy does not infringe on Plaintiffs' right to bear arms or violate equal protection, the right to travel, the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, or due process. Accordingly, the Court denies Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and grants Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 12/10/10. (lmt)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 16 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint; the Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, which is attached as Exhibit A to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 16 . Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 6/25/10. (kaj)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying Defendant William D. Gore's 3 Motion to Dismiss. Because Pla's Complaint alleges sufficient facts to state claims for relief that are plausible on their face, Dft's Motion to Dismiss is denied in its entirety. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 1/14/2010. (jah) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
