Milano v. Aguilerra et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 2, 2013
ORDER Denying 65 Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside, Alter or Amend Judgment. Because Plaintiff fails to demonstrate entitlement to reconsideration under Rule 59(e), the Court DENIES her motion. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 5/1/2013. (sjt)(jrd)
|March 8, 2013
ORDER granting 41 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and Denying as Moot 60 Joint Motion to Continue Pretrial Dates. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this order.Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 3/7/2013. (sjt)
|June 15, 2011
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss certain defendants and claims form plaintiff's first amended complaint for damages, and to strike certain allegations. The Motion is Granted insofar as all claims asserted against Defendants Rolondo Aguilerra and United States Department of Defense are Dismissed With Prejudice and Plaintiffs request for punitive damages is Stricken. In all other respects, Defendants motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 6/15/2011. (mtb)
|February 14, 2011
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part (Doc. 12 ) Defendants' Ex Parte Application; Granting In Part and Denying In Part (Doc. 8 ) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Granting (Doc. 8 ) Defendants' Motion to Strike; and Granting Leave to Amend. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, she must do so no later than February 28, 2011. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 2/14/2011. (srm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?