Stevens v. Optimum Health Institute et al
Nancy Stevens |
Optimum Health Institute, Robert Nees and Does 1 thorugh 20, inclusive |
3:2009cv02565 |
November 13, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Ruben B. Brooks |
William Q. Hayes |
Plaintiff |
Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 ORDER: Any objections to evidence cited in this Order are overruled. Any objections to evidence not cited in this Order are denied as moot. Plaintiff's (Doc. 68 ) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part, as dis cussed in this Order. Defendants' (Doc. 69 ) Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Partial Summary Judgment is denied. No later than 20 days from the date of this Order, the parties shall filed a joint status report identifying the issues that remain to be resolved in this case in light of the rulings in this Order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/24/2011. (mdc) |
Filing 26 ORDER: Defendants' (Doc. 16 ) Amended Motion to Dismiss is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 5/5/2010. (mdc) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint which cures this deficiency within 30 days of the date of this order. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within thirty days, the case will be closed. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/6/2010. (mdc)(jrl). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.