Wargnier v. National City Mortgage Inc et al
| Kelly Lavonne Wargnier |
| National City Mortgage Inc, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc and Does |
| 3:2009cv02721 |
| December 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Jan M. Adler |
| M. James Lorenz |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER denying Defendant's 67 Motion for Reconsideration of Court's 3/29/2012 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff's 70 Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions. Court vacates the 7/26/2013 hearing date. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 7/22/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting 4 Motion to Dismiss the Third and Seventh Causes of Action in Plaintiff's Complaint and Granting Plaintiff Leave to Amend. It is hereby ordered that Defendants' motion to dismiss the third and seventh causes of actions is g ranted with leave to amend. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, she must do so by 7/9/2010. Defendants shall respond within the time set forth in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If Plaintiff chooses not to file an amended complaint, Defendants shall respond within the same period of time calculated from 7/9/2010. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 6/24/2010. (leh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
