Varghese v. Uribe et al

Varghese v. Uribe et al

Petitioner:	Parrakkamannil Koshy Bilji Varghese
Respondent:	Domingo Uribe, Jr. and Edmond G. Brown, Jr.
Case Number:	3:2009cv02801
Filed:	December 10, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	Imperial
Presiding Judge:	William V. Gallo
Presiding Judge:	William Q. Hayes
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 30, 2011	Filing 14 ORDER: The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11 ) except for the following: (1) the prefix "Dr." located at page 7 lines 27-28, page 8 lines 5 and 10, page 9 line 22, and page 10 line 2; (2) the statement that Petitioner 9;s expert was provided a swab of the blood stain located at page 9 line 27 through page 10 line 3, page 17 lines 9-11, and page 19 lines 15-18; and (3) the statement that Petitioner failed to identify an error committed by counsel or how the error r endered an unreliable result at trial located at page 19 lines 18-20. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. (Doc. 1 ). A certificate of appealability is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/30/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 30, 2011

Filing 14 ORDER: The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11 ) except for the following: (1) the prefix "Dr." located at page 7 lines 27-28, page 8 lines 5 and 10, page 9 line 22, and page 10 line 2; (2) the statement that Petitioner 9;s expert was provided a swab of the blood stain located at page 9 line 27 through page 10 line 3, page 17 lines 9-11, and page 19 lines 15-18; and (3) the statement that Petitioner failed to identify an error committed by counsel or how the error r endered an unreliable result at trial located at page 19 lines 18-20. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. (Doc. 1 ). A certificate of appealability is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/30/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Varghese v. Uribe et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Parrakkamannil Koshy Bilji Varghese
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Represented By:	Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Edmond G. Brown, Jr.
Represented By:	Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?