Lau v. Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Lau v. Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996

Lau v. Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996

Plaintiff:	Hon Lau
Defendant:	Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996
Case Number:	3:2009cv02827
Filed:	December 15, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	William Q. Hayes
Presiding Judge:	William McCurine
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 26, 2010	Filing 3 ORDER denying 2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing case without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.1915(a). This action is Dismissed without prejudice for failure to prepay the $350 filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and for failure to successfully move to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff is Granted forty five (45) days from the date this Order is Filed to either: (1) pay the entire $350 filing fee, or (2) file a new Motion to Proc eed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/26/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(IFP form mailed to Plaintiff)(lao) (av1).

Date Filed

Document Text

January 26, 2010

Filing 3 ORDER denying 2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing case without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.1915(a). This action is Dismissed without prejudice for failure to prepay the $350 filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and for failure to successfully move to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff is Granted forty five (45) days from the date this Order is Filed to either: (1) pay the entire $350 filing fee, or (2) file a new Motion to Proc eed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/26/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(IFP form mailed to Plaintiff)(lao) (av1).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lau v. Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hon Lau
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?