Sorrels et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase National Corporate Services, Inc. et al
James Sorrels and Jodi Sorrels |
EMC Mortgage Corporation, Equipoint Financial Network, Inc, J.P. Morgan Chase National Corporate Services, Inc. and DOES |
3:2009cv02884 |
December 23, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
M. James Lorenz |
William McCurine |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER Granting (Doc. 14 ) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Granting Leave To Amend. Defendants JP Morgan and EMC's motion to dismiss is Granted without prejudice. Plaintiffs are Granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint no later than February 28, 2011. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 2/14/2011. (srm) |
Filing 21 ORDER Granting With Prejudice (Doc. 10 ) Defendant Equipoint's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 2/3/2011. (srm) |
Filing 3 ORDER Denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing Action Without Prejudice: Plaintiffs are granted 30 days in which to pay the filing fee required to maintain this action or to file an amended motion and declaration under penalty of perjury in support of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis which provides any and all information supporting in forma pauperis status. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 1/4/10. (mjj) (kaj). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.