Strong v. Horton Plaza, LP et al
Matt Strong |
Horton Plaza, LP, Horton Plaza Venture, LLC, Westfield America, Inc., Aeropostale, Inc., AE Retail West LLC, Gap (Apparel), LLC, Levi's Only Stores, Inc., B. Dalton Bookseller, Inc., Guess? Retail, Inc., Hayun Fashion Investments Corporation, Hot Topic, Inc., Abercrombie and Fitch Stores, Inc, VF Outdoor, Inc., Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. and Beach City Market, Inc. |
3:2009cv02901 |
December 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Jeffrey T. Miller |
Nita L. Stormes |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Americans with Disabilities Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER granting 76 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Added attorney Kevin Michael Salute for Hayun Fashion Investments Corporation. Attorney Jeffrey A. Lipow terminated. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 4/12/2010. (tkl) (jrl). |
Filing 63 ORDER granting 58 59 joint Motions to Dismiss defendants Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. and Levi's Only Stores, Inc. with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 3/30/2010. (tkl) |
Filing 45 ORDER granting 44 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer to plaintiff's complaint. Defendants Westfield America, LP, Horton Plaza, LP, and Horton Plaza Venture, LLCs answer due 3/19/2010. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 3/8/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl) (jrl). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.