Anand v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
| Ciji Anand |
| United Healthcare Insurance Company and Does |
| 3:2009cv02908 |
| December 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William McCurine |
| Thomas J. Whelan |
| Insurance |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER granting Joint Motion to Consolidate Cases and Dismiss in Favor of Binding Arbitration. The following cases shall be consolidated: 09cv2516-H(WMC), 09cv2514-IEG(WMC), 09cv2821-JLS(WVG), 09cv2819-DMS(CAB), and 09cv2907-W(WMC). Plaintiffs and Uni ted Healthcare Insurance Company shall submit all matters to bonding arbitration before Judge H. Lee Sarokin (Ret). Plaintiffs shall collectively bear 50% of the arbitration fees and United shall bear 50% of the arbitration fees. Prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover their portion of the arbitration fees; Consolidated action shall be dismissed w/o prejudice, w/ Court retaining jurisdiction to vacate the dismissal upon showing of good cause to hear a petition to confirm or vacate the arbitrator's award.. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 5/26/2010. (Joint Motion filed in Lead Case Number: 09cv2514-IEG(WMC))(jah) Modified on 5/26/2010 - Edited text. Regenerated NEF (jah).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
