Elie v. Harrinton et al
| Chad Thomas Elie |
| Kelly Harrinton and People of the State of California |
| 3:2009cv02920 |
| December 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Kern |
| Marilyn L. Huff |
| Peter C. Lewis |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 35 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; and denying 33 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal. Because Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right," the Court declines t o issue a certificate of appealability. Because the Court denies Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability, the Court denies as moot Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 9/20/2011. (USCA Case Number 11-56599. Order electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court denies Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court also denies a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 06/09/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
