Hughes v. Equity Plus Financial et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 15, 2010
ORDER Granting 19 Wachovia's Motion to Dismiss; Quashing Service on Equity Plus Financial; Denying as moot 20 Equity Plus Financial's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims against Wachovia are DISMISSED. However, the Court will gi ve Plaintiff one more chance to amend her claims against Wachovia. Any amended complaint must be filed within 15 days of the entry of this Order. The Court also QUASHES service on Equity Plus Financial. Plaintiff must properly serve the operative complaint and a summons on Equity Plus Financial and file a proof of service within 30 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 11/15/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer)
|July 19, 2010
ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's claims against Wachovia(sued as "Golden West Financial, FSB, d/b/a World Savings Bank, FSB, Wachovia, FSB, Wells Fargo, N.A.") are Dismissed for failure to state a claim. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 15 days of the entry of this Order. The Court also Orders Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed against Equity Plus Financial for failure to serve it with the summons and complaint within 120 days. Plaintiff's response to the OSC is due by 8/2/2010. The Court calendars the OSC Hearing for 8/6/2010 at 11:00 AM. Unless directed by the Court, there shall be no oral argument and no personal appearances are necessary. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/19/2010. (leh)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?