Christopher et al v. First Franklin Financial Corporation et al
| Herman Q. Christopher and Deshawn Reilly |
| First Franklin Financial Corporation, LaSalle Bank, N.A., Merill Lynch Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-4, Bank of America, N.A., Merscorp, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Home Loan Services, Inc., Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp., DOES, ROES and All Other Persons and Entities |
| 3:2010cv00017 |
| January 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Dana M. Sabraw |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Defendants' Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction re 13 , 15 . Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Defendants' motion to strike is denied as moot. Finally, in light of the Court's decision, Defendants' motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction is granted. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 9/29/10. (lao)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting 6 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint consistent with this Order within twenty (20) days of the date this Order is posted. Defendants' motion to strike is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/30/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
