Anderson v. San Diego Police Department et al
Raymond C Anderson |
San Diego Police Department and John Doe |
3:2010cv00089 |
January 12, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Ruben B. Brooks |
William Q. Hayes |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER Denying Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) And Dismissing Case Without Prejudice Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a): Plaintiff is granted 45 days from the date this Order is Filed to either: (1) pay the entire $350 filing fe e, or (2) file a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). If Plaintiff neither pays the $350 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and files the attached Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of his prison trust account statement within 45 days, this action shall remained closed without further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 2/4/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; per Order, a blank Motion to Proceed IFP form also sent to Plaintiff.) (mdc) (av1). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.