Jones v. Marshall

Jones v. Marshall

Petitioner:	Wydell D Jones
Respondent:	John Marshall
Case Number:	3:2010cv00376
Filed:	February 16, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Luis Obispo
Presiding Judge:	Michael M. Anello
Presiding Judge:	William V. Gallo
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 19, 2012	Filing 37 ORDER: Adopting 20 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge; Overruling 34 Petitioner's Objections; and Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the files and reco rds herein, the Court Adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court Denies Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue in this action. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/19/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
June 14, 2011	Filing 22 ORDER Sua Sponte Substituting Respondent: The Court hereby orders the substitution of Matthew Cate, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in place of John Marshall. The Clerk shall modify the docket to reflect that Matthew Cate is the respondent in place of John Marshall. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 6/14/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 19, 2012

Filing 37 ORDER: Adopting 20 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge; Overruling 34 Petitioner's Objections; and Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the files and reco rds herein, the Court Adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court Denies Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue in this action. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/19/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

June 14, 2011

Filing 22 ORDER Sua Sponte Substituting Respondent: The Court hereby orders the substitution of Matthew Cate, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in place of John Marshall. The Clerk shall modify the docket to reflect that Matthew Cate is the respondent in place of John Marshall. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 6/14/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Marshall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Wydell D Jones
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: John Marshall
Represented By:	Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?