SPH America, LLC v. Apple, Inc. et al
| SPH America, LLC |
| Motorola, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Nokia Inc., Palm, Inc., Personal Communications Devices, LLC, Personal Communications Devices Holdings, LLC, UTSTARCOM, Inc., Vertu Group, LLC, ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc. |
| Personal Communications Devices, LLC |
| SPH America, LLC |
| 3:2010cv00404 |
| February 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
172
ORDER granting 171 Joint Motion to Dismiss Motorola, Inc. without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2). Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 06/24/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
|
Filing
170
ORDER granting 163 Joint Motion to Dismiss UTStarcom Inc. without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 06/16/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER granting 162 Joint Motion to Dismiss Personal Communications Devices LLC without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2).. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 06/16/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
