Harris v. Bueno et al
Willie L Harris |
A Bueno, B Bligh and City of San Diego |
3:2010cv00450 |
February 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
Tuolumne |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Barry Ted Moskowitz |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER setting Supplemental Briefing Schedule. If Mr. Bhandari wants to file a supplemental reply to Defendants' opposition, he must do so on or before December 9, 2011. If Mr. Bhandari does file a supplemental reply, Defendants may file a sur-reply on or before December 16, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 12/2/11.(ecs) |
Filing 12 ORDER Denying 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 9/1/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer) (jrl). |
Filing 4 ORDER: (1) Granting 2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, imposing no partial filing fee, garnishing $350 balance from prisoner's trust account 2 ; (2) Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel 3 without prejudice and (3) directing U. S. Marshal to effect service of complaint pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 4(c)(3) & 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 4/21/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR)(pro per package mailed)(lao) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.