Rutherford et al v. MuscleTech Research and Development, Inc et al
| Debra Rutherford, Dana Crawford, Michael Maggard and Travis D Horton |
| Muscletech Research and Development, Inc., Iovate Health Sciences USA., Inc, Iovate Health Sciences Research, Inc, Iovate Copyright, Ltd, Iovate Health Sciences Group, Inc, Iovate Health Sciences International, Inc, Iovate HC 2005 Formulations, LTD, Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and GNC Corporation |
| 3:2010cv00673 |
| March 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Denying As Moot Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 17 and 18 . Plaintiff's shall file their amended complaint on or before July 23, 2010. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/1/10. (vet)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Regarding Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. The Court hereby orders Defendants to file a response, if any, to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend on or before June 28, 2010. Thereafter, the Motion for Leave to Amend shall be deemed submitted for the Court's consideration on the papers without oral argument. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 6/22/10.(vet)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
