Agricola ABC, S.A. de C.V. v. Chiquita Fresh North America, LLC. et al
| Agricola ABC, S.A. de C.V. |
| Chiquita Fresh North America, LLC., Chiquita Frupac, Inc, Alejandro Canelos Rodriguez and Aristeo Alejandro Canelos Guillen |
| 3:2010cv00772 |
| April 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [Doc. No. 112, 114 and joinder motion Doc. No.118] are hereby GRANTED and the remaining motions, Doc. Nos. 106 and the non-jurisdictional portions of 114, are hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff Agricolas motions: (1) a Motion to Substitute Party; and (2) a Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint, [Doc. Nos. 92 and 93 respectively], are DENIED.(cge)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Chiquita Frupac, Inc.'s Motion to Amend Answer to Add Counterclaims and Crossclaims. The Court Grants Chiquita leave to file its proposed counterclaims against Plaintiff Agricola ABC, SA de CV, and third parties Constantino Canelos Rodriguez and Aristeo Canelos vila; The Court Grants Chiquita leave to file its proposed crossclaims against Defendants Alejandro Canelos Rodriguez and Aristeo Alejandro Canelos Guilln; The Court Denies Chiquita 9;s motion for leave to amend in all other respects. The Clerk is directed to strike Chiquita's Amended Answer, filed as docket no. 41 . Chiquita shall file its Amended Answer including the above designated Counterclaims and Crossclaims within ten (10) days of the filing of this order. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 12/6/10. (lao)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 29 Motion for Reconsideration of Court's Order Quashing Service of Process. Court grants motion as to Dft Aristeo Alejandro Canelos Guillen and finds he was properly served pursuant t o FRCP 4 and CCP 415.20. Dft shall file response to the Complaint under FRCP 12 w/in 10 days of the filing of this Order. Court denies motion as to Dft Alejandro Canelos Rodriguez. Pla is granted 45 days additional days to initiate the procedure to serve Alejandro Canelos through appropriate international methods. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 11/19/2010. (jah)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying Defendants Alejandro Canelos Rodriguez and Aristeo Alejandro Canelos Guillen's 15 Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Improper Service and Insufficient Service of Process. Court finds that service of process was not sufficient and alternatively quashes service of processs. Plaintiff is granted 60 days to properly effect service upon Dfts Alejandro Canelos Rodriguez and Aristeo Alejandro Canelos. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 7/28/2010. (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
