Seymour v. United States Department of Defense et al
| Jessica Seymour |
| United States Department of Defense, Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, Treasury Department, Internal Revenue, Office of the Department of National Intelligence, Attorney General, Department of State and DOES |
| 3:2010cv00983 |
| May 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| John A. Houston |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER: Revoking Plaintiff's in forma pauperis Status. Accordingly, the Court hereby CERTIFIES that Plaintiff's appeal is not in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), and REVOKES Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status. Furt her requests to proceed on appeal as a poor person should be directed, on motion, to the Ninth Circuit, in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/25/2011. (USCA Case No. 11-55443. Order electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER: (1) denying 18 Challenge to District Judge; (2) denying 16 Motion to Change Venue; (3) Dismissing Action with Prejudice; (4) denying as moot 58 80 82 99 Remaining Motions: The Court dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). This Order concludes the litigation in this matter. The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 2/24/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER: (1) Construing Plaintiff's amended complaint as a motion for leave to amend; (2) Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend; (3) finding as moot 33 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss: the Court denies as moot Defendants' p ending motion to dismiss and vacates the hearing presently set for 10/28/10.Defendants' time to respond to Plaintiff's amended complaint shall run from the date the Court's Order is electronically docketed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/29/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying 32 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order: Since Plaintiff has not established her likelihood of success on the merits as required by the United State Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, her motion for a temporary restraining order must be Denied. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/26/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
