Munoz v. Social Security Administration et al
Gilberto G Munoz |
Social Security Administration, Michael J Astrue, Jose Garnica, Dwight Williams and Blanca Barbosa |
3:2010cv01003 |
May 11, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Michael M. Anello |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 124 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Following Bench Trial: For the reasons stated herein, the Court Grants Defendant's Motion for Judgment on Partial Findings Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(c). Plaintiff is not entitled to an y damages on his medical inquiry claim. This order, together with the 11/26/2012 Summary Judgment Order, constitute a final disposition of all claims in this action. Therefore, the Clerk of Court is instructed to enter final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a) and terminate this action. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/14/2013.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Filing 107 ORDER Denying 102 Request for Appointment of Counsel. The Court finds that the circumstances here do not warrant appointing counsel to represent Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Court Denies Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/19/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Filing 55 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 52 Ex Parte Motion For Determination of Discovery Dispute. Plaintiff must supplement any responses identified herein by 5/11/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 4/26/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Filing 42 ORDER denying 38 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court is instructed to modify the docket to reflect Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security as defendant in place of the United States of America. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/24/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Filing 32 ORDER: Granting 25 Motion to Dismiss; and Denying Without Prejudice 27 Request For Appointment of Counsel. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff's Request for Appointment of Counsel is denied without prejudice. Defendants' Motion to Dism iss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) is granted. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, it shall be filed by 4/13/2011. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/23/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Filing 24 ORDER denying 23 Request for Appointment of Counsel. While the Court again denies Plaintiff's request, the Court does so without prejudice. However, the Court advises Plaintiff that it will not entertain any further requests to appoint counsel until Defendants have appeared in this action at which time the Court will be able to more properly assess the merits of Plaintiff's claims. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/11/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.