The Upper Deck Company et al v. Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company et al
| The Upper Deck Company and The Upper Deck, Company, Inc. |
| Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company and DOES |
| Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company |
| The Upper Deck Company and The Upper Deck, Company, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv01032 |
| May 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jeffrey T. Miller |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company's 82 Motion for Terminating Sanctions. Court denies Dft's request for evidentiary and dispositive sanctions. Court grants in part Dft' ;s request for monetary sanctions. Court awards Dft fees and costs in the amt of $3,407.00. Sanctions shall be paid by Upper Deck and McWilliam by 10/14/2011. Upper Deck and McWilliam must file a Notice of Payment of Sanctions by 10/21/2011. Cou nter-defendant McWilliam shall appear for deposition. Counsel to meet and confer on a date and location and file a joint status report indicating agreed upon date, time and location by 10/14/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 10/5/2011. (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
