Nelson v. Clark
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 7, 2011
ORDER denying 36 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. After reviewing the petition, this motion, the Court's prior order, and other related papers, the Court again concludes that Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing" of the denial of a constitutional right. Reasonable jurists would not find it debatable whether the Court was correct in its procedural ruling on the statute of limitations issue. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner's motion for a certifica te of appealability with respect to all of Petitioner's claims. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 10/7/2011. (USCA Case Number 11-56716. Order electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
|August 23, 2011
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Court adopts in full Magistrate Judge Dembin's 30 Report and Recommendation and grants Respondent's 12 Motion to Dismiss. The Petition is denied with prejudice. Court denies a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 8/23/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|January 7, 2011
ORDER Sua Sponte Substituting Respondent: the Court sua sponte Orders the substitution of Matthew Cate, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, as Respondent in place of Ken Clark. The Clerk of the Court shall modify the docket to reflect Matthew Cate, Secretary in place of the former respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 1/7/11.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)(jrl).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?